Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
meeting2 [2015/05/18 09:56] grenier |
meeting2 [2015/05/18 10:08] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
4. Revive the T2 Case dealing with the evolution of permafrost depths during geological time scales. This point leads to a reassessment of the sensitivity of simulations to the time step for highly variable temperature input signals. | 4. Revive the T2 Case dealing with the evolution of permafrost depths during geological time scales. This point leads to a reassessment of the sensitivity of simulations to the time step for highly variable temperature input signals. | ||
5. Consider large scale studies. This points at the limits of the simulations considering coarse grids. | 5. Consider large scale studies. This points at the limits of the simulations considering coarse grids. | ||
- | More details related with these future tasks are to be found on the web site on the page associated with the April meeting (https:// | + | |
- | A complement to the parameter sheet is appended and is placed as well on the web site complementing the initial parameter sheets. | + | |
Action List | Action List | ||
- | 1. Provide proceedings of April meeting with action list, participant list and participant presentations on the web site (CG) | ||
- | 2. Provide mathematical expressions for some unclearly defined performance measures (CG on the web site and appended document complementing the parameter sheet) | ||
- | 3. Introduce some complementary performance measures for TH2 and TH3 (same) | ||
- | 4. Introduce a new performance measure for TH3 (point evolution of temperature, | ||
- | 5. Provide all code questionnaires on the web site for us to track the origins of discrepancies in the results or understand the performances of our codes (compilation by CG, see the participant pages on the InterFrost web site. Click on the name of the codes providing access to the code questionnaires: | ||
- | https:// | ||
- | Please remind that this access is limited to InterFrost participants under the username interfrost and password paris2014 | ||
- | 6. Provide all TH2 and TH3 results by June 30th (all participants). Please provide for each performance measure and head gradient an ascii file with two columns (time (s); | ||
- | Schedule | + | - Provide proceedings of April meeting with action list, participant list and participant presentations on the web site (CG) |
- | • All results definitive results are to be provided by the 30th of June 2015 | + | - Provide mathematical expressions for some unclearly defined performance measures (CG on the web site and appended document complementing the parameter sheet) |
- | • The draft of a common paper will then be provided | + | - Introduce some complementary performance measures for TH2 and TH3 (same) |
+ | - Introduce | ||
+ | - Provide all code questionnaires on the web site for us to track the origins of discrepancies in the results or understand the performances | ||
+ | - Provide all TH2 and TH3 results by June 30th (all participants). Please provide for each performance measure and head gradient an ascii file with two columns (time (s); | ||
+ | |||
+ | A complement to the initial parameter sheet is to be found at {{: | ||
+ | Important schedule items are that all definitive results are to be provided by the 30th of June 2015. The draft of a common paper will then be provided to the participants in summer for common redaction until the final submission by the end of 2015 |