Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
test_cases:seven [2014/10/14 15:32] grenier |
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 11:35] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Advection with constant velocity is added to conduction and phase change. Analytical solution from Kurylyk et al. 2014 based on a reassessment of solutions by Lunardini. | + | Advection with constant velocity is here added to conduction and phase change. Analytical solution |
+ | |||
+ | The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. The recommanded benchmark 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as TH1 cases (differing by flow velocities). The recommanded benchmark 1 (Neuman case) is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided as T1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | One may refer to " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Another source is the presentation by Barret Kurylyk of these items for the kick off meeting ({{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Main points are summed up below. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Initial and boundary conditions: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Parameter set: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Analytical solutions in {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Approach used for SUTRA code: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
- | {{ : | ||
- | in Analytical solutions for benchmarking cold regions subsurface water flow and energy transport models: One-dimensional soil thaw | ||
- | with conduction and advection by B. Kurylyk, J. McKenzie, K. MacQuarrie, C. Voss in Advances in Water Resources 70 (2014) 172–184 |