Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 11:14] grenier |
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 11:35] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. The recommanded benchmark 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as TH1 cases (differing by flow velocities). The recommanded benchmark 1 (Neuman case) is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided as T1. | The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. The recommanded benchmark 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as TH1 cases (differing by flow velocities). The recommanded benchmark 1 (Neuman case) is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided as T1. | ||
- | Refer to Analytical solutions for benchmarking cold regions subsurface water flow and energy transport models: One-dimensional soil thaw | + | One may refer to "Analytical solutions for benchmarking cold regions subsurface water flow and energy transport models: One-dimensional soil thaw with conduction and advection" |
- | with conduction and advection by B. Kurylyk, J. McKenzie, K. MacQuarrie, C. Voss in Advances in Water Resources 70 (2014) 172–184 | + | |
- | The presentation by Barret of these items for the kick off meeting | + | Another source is the presentation by Barret |
+ | Main points are summed up below. | ||
+ | Initial and boundary conditions: | ||
- | {{ : | + | {{ : |
+ | |||
+ | Parameter set: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Analytical solutions in {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Approach used for SUTRA code: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||