Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 11:43] grenier |
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 14:26] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. One may refer to " | The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. One may refer to " | ||
- | Another | + | A presentation of the TH1 Case by Barret Kurylyk was made during the kick off meeting ({{: |
- | The recommanded benchmark 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered. The recommanded benchmark 1 (Neuman case) is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided as T1. | + | The recommanded benchmark |
+ | Benchmark 1 (Neuman case) recommanded by Kurylyk et al 2014 is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided in the InterFrost project as T1. | ||
- | + | **TH1 Test Case** | |
Initial and boundary conditions: | Initial and boundary conditions: | ||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | The analytical solutions of Kurylyk et al 2014 are contained in this {{: | + | The analytical solutions of Kurylyk et al 2014 are accessible here as as xls {{: |
- | The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the domain | + | The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the simulated |
{{ : | {{ : | ||