Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 14:23] grenier |
test_cases:seven [2014/12/19 14:28] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Advection with constant velocity is here added to conduction and phase change. Analytical solution are proposed from Kurylyk et al. 2014 paper based on a reassessment of solutions by Lunardini. Although not physically realistic (constant velocity) these solutions can be used for benchmarking purposes: "Lack of fidelity to physical processes does not limit ability to serve as benchmark" | + | Advection with constant velocity is here added to conduction and phase change. Analytical solution are proposed from Kurylyk et al. 2014 paper based on a reassessment of solutions by Lunardini. Although not physically realistic (constant velocity |
The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. One may refer to " | The paper Kurylyk et al. 2014 describes at depth the analytical solutions available, the suggested benchmark cases and SUTRA code runs to compare with these solutions. One may refer to " | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
A presentation of the TH1 Case by Barret Kurylyk was made during the kick off meeting ({{: | A presentation of the TH1 Case by Barret Kurylyk was made during the kick off meeting ({{: | ||
- | The recommanded benchmark Kurylyk et al 2014 Cases 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered. Benchmark 1 (Neuman case) recommanded by Kurylyk et al 2014 is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided in the InterFrost project as T1. | + | The recommanded benchmark Kurylyk et al 2014 Cases 2 and 3 are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered: Velocities of 10 and 100 m/yr should be considered. |
+ | Benchmark 1 (Neuman case) recommanded by Kurylyk et al 2014 is an option to complement the Lunardini case provided in the InterFrost project as T1. | ||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | The analytical solutions of Kurylyk et al 2014 are contained in this {{: | + | The analytical solutions of Kurylyk et al 2014 are accessible here as as xls {{: |
The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the simulated domain and the approach for the freezing curve function in order to approximate the step function with a linear curve: | The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the simulated domain and the approach for the freezing curve function in order to approximate the step function with a linear curve: |