Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
test_cases:seven [2014/12/22 14:17] grenier |
test_cases:seven [2014/12/22 14:26] grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Benchmark cases 2 and 3 recommended by Kurylyk et al. (2014) are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered: Velocities of 10 and 100 m/yr should be considered. These benchmarks are based on the following analytical solution: | Benchmark cases 2 and 3 recommended by Kurylyk et al. (2014) are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered: Velocities of 10 and 100 m/yr should be considered. These benchmarks are based on the following analytical solution: | ||
- | | + | {{ : |
where X is the depth to the thawing front, α is the thermal diffusivity, | where X is the depth to the thawing front, α is the thermal diffusivity, | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
- | The analytical solutions | + | The analytical solutions |
The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the simulated domain and the approach for the freezing curve function in order to approximate the step function with a linear curve: | The approach used for SUTRA code is summed up in two figures from Kurylyk et al 2014 as a source of inspiration. They provide the simulated domain and the approach for the freezing curve function in order to approximate the step function with a linear curve: |