Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
test_cases:seven [2014/12/22 14:21]
grenier 		test_cases:seven [2014/12/30 14:50]
grenier
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 Benchmark cases 2 and 3 recommended by Kurylyk et al. (2014) are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered: Velocities of 10 and 100 m/yr should be considered. These benchmarks are based on the following analytical solution: Benchmark cases 2 and 3 recommended by Kurylyk et al. (2014) are included in the InterFrost project as two TH1 cases differing by the flow velocity considered: Velocities of 10 and 100 m/yr should be considered. These benchmarks are based on the following analytical solution:
-                                                                                                                +{{ :test_cases:th1_equation.jpg?300 |}}                                                                           
 where X is the depth to the thawing front, α is the thermal diffusivity, vt is the thermal plume velocity due to advection, t is time, and ST is the dimensionless Stefan number.   where X is the depth to the thawing front, α is the thermal diffusivity, vt is the thermal plume velocity due to advection, t is time, and ST is the dimensionless Stefan number.  
  
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 Initial and boundary conditions:  Initial and boundary conditions: 
 +{{ :test_cases:conceptualmodelfigure.jpg?400 |}}
  
-{{ :test_cases:conditions.jpg?400 |}}+Parameter table (as {{:test_cases:parameter_table.pdf|pdf file}}):
  
-Parameter set: 
- 
-{{ :test_cases:diapositive2.jpg?900 |}} 
  
 The analytical solutions results selected by Kurylyk et al. (2014) for benchmarks are accessible here as an xls {{:test_cases:mmc1.xlsx|file}}. Code developers are encouraged to email Barret Kurylyk (barret.kurylyk@ucalgary.ca) with any questions regarding the analytical solution or numerical model parameterization. The analytical solutions results selected by Kurylyk et al. (2014) for benchmarks are accessible here as an xls {{:test_cases:mmc1.xlsx|file}}. Code developers are encouraged to email Barret Kurylyk (barret.kurylyk@ucalgary.ca) with any questions regarding the analytical solution or numerical model parameterization.