Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
home [2015/03/10 14:44]
grenier [Kick-off meeting in Paris, 18-19 November 2014]
home [2020/07/01 14:31]
grenier
Line 1: Line 1:
 +{{:interfrost1.png?300|}}
 +
 +
 ====== Intercomparison project for TH (Thermo-Hydro) coupled heat and water transfers in permafrost regions ====== ====== Intercomparison project for TH (Thermo-Hydro) coupled heat and water transfers in permafrost regions ======
  
 Page hosted by [[http://www.lsce.ipsl.fr|LSCE]] (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement)  Page hosted by [[http://www.lsce.ipsl.fr|LSCE]] (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement) 
  
 +===== Results of the first phase of InterFrost, involving test cases TH2 and TH3 =====
 +
 +The results are now published and available as data file from the [[intercomparaison_results:test_case1|results]] page
 +
 +===== Third meeting in Paris, 22-23 Novembre 2017 =====
 +
 +[[meeting3|November 2017 meeting information]] 
 +
 +===== Inter-comparison, July 2017 stand =====
 +
 +[[intercomp2|July 2017 final results]] 
 +
 +===== Inter-comparison, July 2015 stand =====
  
-===== Next meeting in Paris, 9-10 April 2015 =====+[[intercomp1|July stand of the inter-comparison]] 
  
 +===== Second meeting in Paris, 9-10 April 2015 =====
  
 +[[meeting2|Second meeting information]] 
  
-===== Kick-off meeting in Paris, 18-19 November 2014 =====+===== Kick-off meeting in Paris, 18-19 Novembre 2014 =====
  
 [[meeting|Kick-off meeting information]]  [[meeting|Kick-off meeting information]] 
Line 25: Line 43:
 **The INTERFROST Project** **The INTERFROST Project**
  
-We propose here a benchmark exercise dealing with the “Subsurface thermal hydrologic processes” as presented by (Painter et al., 2012). In a first phase of the project we firstly limit our efforts to the more simple set of equations involving Darcy flow (fully saturated porous medium) coupled with heat transfer with advection and phase change. Extensions of the benchmark to Richard equations or including the air phase are considered for later phases of the project. +We propose here a benchmark exercise dealing with the “Subsurface thermal hydrologic processes” as presented by (Painter et al., 2012) or within the field of Cryohydrogeology (McKenzie et al. 2020) [[https://tc.copernicus.org/preprints/tc-2020-132/]]. In a first phase of the project we firstly limit our efforts to the more simple set of equations involving Darcy flow (fully saturated porous medium) coupled with heat transfer with advection and phase change. Extensions of the benchmark to Richard equations or including the air phase are considered for later phases of the project. 
  
 Phase I of the benchmark consists of some test cases inspired by existing literature (e.g. Mc Kenzie et al., 2007) as well as new ones. Some experimental cases in cold room will complement the validation approach. In view of a second phase, the benchmark project is open as well to new or alternative cases reflecting a numerical or a process oriented interest or answering a more general concern among the cold region community.  Phase I of the benchmark consists of some test cases inspired by existing literature (e.g. Mc Kenzie et al., 2007) as well as new ones. Some experimental cases in cold room will complement the validation approach. In view of a second phase, the benchmark project is open as well to new or alternative cases reflecting a numerical or a process oriented interest or answering a more general concern among the cold region community.