Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
meeting2 [2015/05/18 09:56]
grenier
meeting2 [2015/05/18 10:21] (current)
grenier
Line 10: Line 10:
  
  
-The main results of preliminary inter-comparison were presented by C. Grenier at the 2015 EGU meeting in Vienna (Permafrost Open Session): {{:interfrost_results_at_egu2015.pdf|}}+The main results of the inter-comparison with the preliminary results were presented by C. Grenier at the 2015 EGU meeting in Vienna (Permafrost Open Session): {{:interfrost_results_at_egu2015.pdf|}}
  
 The inter-comparison results and points discussed during our April InterFrost meeting are all included in the C. Grenier presentation {{:grenier_interfrostresults_discussions.pdf|}} The inter-comparison results and points discussed during our April InterFrost meeting are all included in the C. Grenier presentation {{:grenier_interfrostresults_discussions.pdf|}}
Line 41: Line 41:
 4. Revive the T2 Case dealing with the evolution of permafrost depths during geological time scales. This point leads to a reassessment of the sensitivity of simulations to the time step for highly variable temperature input signals. 4. Revive the T2 Case dealing with the evolution of permafrost depths during geological time scales. This point leads to a reassessment of the sensitivity of simulations to the time step for highly variable temperature input signals.
 5. Consider large scale studies. This points at the limits of the simulations considering coarse grids. 5. Consider large scale studies. This points at the limits of the simulations considering coarse grids.
-More details related with these future tasks are to be found on the web site on the page associated with the April meeting (https://wiki.lsce.ipsl.fr/interfrost/doku.php?id=meeting2) as grenier_interfrostresults_discussions.pdf + 
-A complement to the parameter sheet is appended and is placed as well on the web site complementing the initial parameter sheets. + 
 Action List Action List
-1. Provide proceedings of April meeting with action list, participant list and participant presentations on the web site (CG) 
-2. Provide mathematical expressions for some unclearly defined performance measures (CG on the web site and appended document complementing the parameter sheet) 
-3. Introduce some complementary performance measures for TH2 and TH3 (same)  
-4. Introduce a new performance measure for TH3 (point evolution of temperature, see Fig. 1) – refer to the complement to the parameter sheet (appended and on the web site). For the sake of illustration, the Cast3M results are provided below on Fig. 2 & 3.  
-5. Provide all code questionnaires on the web site for us to track the origins of discrepancies in the results or understand the performances of our codes (compilation by CG, see the participant pages on the InterFrost web site. Click on the name of the codes providing access to the code questionnaires: 
-https://wiki.lsce.ipsl.fr/interfrost/doku.php?id=participant_labs:all 
-Please remind that this access is limited to InterFrost participants under the username interfrost and password paris2014 
-6. Provide all TH2 and TH3 results by June 30th (all participants). Please provide for each performance measure and head gradient an ascii file with two columns (time (s);Performance Measure), separator “;” with names TH2_PMi_GHj and TH3_PMi_GHj 
  
-Schedule +  - Provide proceedings of April meeting with action list, participant list and participant presentations on the web site (CG) 
-• All results definitive results are to be provided by the 30th of June 2015 +  - Provide mathematical expressions for some unclearly defined performance measures (CG on the web site and appended document complementing the parameter sheet) 
-• The draft of common paper will then be provided to the participants in summer for common redaction until the final submission by the end of 2015+  - Introduce some complementary performance measures for TH2 and TH3 (same)  
 +  - Introduce new performance measure for TH3 (point evolution of temperature, see Fig. 1) – refer to the complement to the TH2 and TH3 parameter sheets ({{:th2_3_parameter_sheet_complement.pdf|}}).  
 +  - Provide all code questionnaires on the web site to track the origins of discrepancies in the results or understand the performances of our codes ([[participant_labs:all|participant pages]], click on the name of the code, participant access only).  
 +  - Provide all TH2 and TH3 results by June 30th (all participants). Please provide for each performance measure and head gradient an ascii file with two columns (time (s);Performance Measure), separator “;” with names TH2_PMi_GHj and TH3_PMi_GHj 
  
 +Important points of schedule are that **__all definitive results are to be provided by the 30th of June 2015__**. The draft of a common paper will then be provided to the participants in summer for common redaction until the final submission by the end of 2015