User Tools

Site Tools


pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice [2015/02/18 17:09]
ruza
pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice [2015/03/02 10:22]
ruza
Line 5: Line 5:
    More info here: http://​wiki.splitbrain.org/​plugin:​discussion */    More info here: http://​wiki.splitbrain.org/​plugin:​discussion */
        
-/* ~~DISCUSSION|Discussion on core experiment ​design~~ *+~~DISCUSSION|Discussion on core experiment ​ice sheets~~
  
 ====== Last Deglaciation Ice Sheets ====== ====== Last Deglaciation Ice Sheets ======
Line 13: Line 13:
 [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​core|Go back]] to the main core experiment design page. \\ [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​core|Go back]] to the main core experiment design page. \\
 [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​index|Go back]] to the main working group page. \\ [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​index|Go back]] to the main working group page. \\
-Please note, this page is a work in progress and is not ready for discussion yet. \\ 
 \\  \\ 
-Please use the //​Discussion//​ section below to specifically comment on the choice of __ice sheet reconstructions__ for the core experiment. \\ \\+Please use the //​Discussion//​ section below to specifically comment on the choice of __ice sheet reconstructions__ for the core experiment. 
 +\\ \\
  
 ---- ----
Line 24: Line 24:
   * [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​ice#​Lev_Tarasov'​s_Reconstruction | Lev Tarasov'​s reconstruction]],​ provided by Lev Tarasov and co-authors.   * [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​ice#​Lev_Tarasov'​s_Reconstruction | Lev Tarasov'​s reconstruction]],​ provided by Lev Tarasov and co-authors.
  
-Please one of these reconstructions for your Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) experiment, as per the LGM working group requirements,​ and continue to use the same reconstruction through the transient last deglaciation ​core simulation. \\+Please ​use one of these reconstructions for your Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) experiment, as per the LGM working group requirements,​ and continue to use the same reconstruction through the transient last deglaciation ​Core simulation. \\
 \\ \\
-Those groups that are able may wish to carry out two simulations;​ one with each ice sheet reconstruction. \\ \\+Those groups that are able may wish to carry out two simulations;​ one with each ice sheet reconstruction. ​ \\  
 +\\ 
 +This page contains a lot of information;​ use the 'Table of Contents'​ (top right) to navigate through! ​\\ \\
  
 ---- ----
Line 53: Line 55:
  
 The information in this section was provided directly by Dick Peltier et al., October 2014: The information in this section was provided directly by Dick Peltier et al., October 2014:
-> Time dependent //​ice-equivalent//​ contribution to eustatic sea level rise [relative to present day] from each of the primary geographical regions from which grounded ice loss occurred during the [last] deglaciation process. ((Plot provided by Dick Peltier, October 2014)) {{ http://​homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/​~earri/​pmip_deglac/​ICE-6GC_ESL.png?​400 |ICE-6G_C Eustatic Sea Level Equivalent of ice volume }}+> Time dependent //​ice-equivalent//​ contribution to eustatic sea level rise [relative to present day] from each of the primary geographical regions from which grounded ice loss occurred during the [last] deglaciation process. ((Plot provided by Dick Peltier, October 2014)) {{ http://​homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/​~earri/​pmip_deglac/​ICE-6GC_ESL.png?​500 |ICE-6G_C Eustatic Sea Level Equivalent of ice volume }}
  
 ^  Ice-equivalent contribution to eustatic sea level rise (m) ((relative to present day and assuming ocean area = 360,768,600 km<​sup>​2</​sup>​)) ​ ^^^^ ^  Ice-equivalent contribution to eustatic sea level rise (m) ((relative to present day and assuming ocean area = 360,768,600 km<​sup>​2</​sup>​)) ​ ^^^^
Line 159: Line 161:
 Please think about the following points and add any comments on these or any other aspects of the experiment design to the discussion section below: [Topics will be added here as they are raised below or by email.] Please think about the following points and add any comments on these or any other aspects of the experiment design to the discussion section below: [Topics will be added here as they are raised below or by email.]
   * Should ICE-6G_C be provided here in its smoothed format, as offered by Dick Peltier (above; ​ [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​ice#​smoothed_fields]]),​ its original unsmoothed format, or both?    * Should ICE-6G_C be provided here in its smoothed format, as offered by Dick Peltier (above; ​ [[pmip3:​wg:​degla:​bc:​ice#​smoothed_fields]]),​ its original unsmoothed format, or both? 
-  * Should Lev Tarasov'​s reconstruction be provided with a 500 year timestep? It is currently 1000 years, but can be rerun with a shorter timestep.\\ \\+  * Should Lev Tarasov'​s reconstruction be provided with a 500 year timestep? It is currently 1000 years, but could be provided ​with a shorter timestep.\\ \\
  
 ---- ----
pmip3/wg/degla/bc/ice.txt · Last modified: 2015/10/21 13:49 by ruza