User Tools

Site Tools


pmip3:wg:p2f:methods

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
pmip3:wg:p2f:methods [2013/09/24 06:45]
jules [Keywords]
pmip3:wg:p2f:methods [2013/09/24 06:49]
jules [Overview of papers]
Line 159: Line 159:
  
 ==Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum== ==Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum==
-Schmittner, A., Urban N. M., Shakun, J. D., Mahowald, N. M., Clark, P. U., Bartlein, P. J., Mix, A. C., and Rosell-Mele,​ A., Science, 334, 1385-1388, doi: 10.1126/​science.1203513,​ 2011+Schmittner, A., Urban N. M., Shakun, J. D., Mahowald, N. M., Clark, P. U., Bartlein, P. J., Mix, A. C., and Rosell-Mele,​ A., Science, 334, 1385-1388, [[http://​www.sciencemag.org/​content/​334/​6061/​1385.abstract?​keytype=ref&​siteid=sci&​ijkey=jI1RklqVcZeJ6|paywall]], doi: 10.1126/​science.1203513,​ 2011
  
 //keywords: single-model ensemble, LGM, Climate Sensitivity//​ //keywords: single-model ensemble, LGM, Climate Sensitivity//​
  
-''​Abstract:​Assessing the impact of future anthropogenic carbon emissions is currently impeded by uncertainties in our knowledge of equilibrium climate sensitivity to atmospheric carbon dioxide doubling. Previous studies suggest 3 kelvin (K) as the best estimate, 2 to 4.5 K as the 66% probability range, and nonzero probabilities for much higher values, the latter implying a small chance of high-impact climate changes that would be difficult to avoid. Here, combining extensive sea and land surface temperature reconstructions from the Last Glacial Maximum with climate model simulations,​ we estimate a lower median (2.3 K) and reduced uncertainty (1.7 to 2.6 K as the 66% probability range, which can be widened using alternate assumptions or data subsets). Assuming that paleoclimatic constraints apply to the future, as predicted by our model, these results imply a lower probability of imminent extreme climatic change than previously thought.'' ​+''​Abstract:​Assessing the impact of future anthropogenic carbon emissions is currently impeded by uncertainties in our knowledge of equilibrium climate sensitivity to atmospheric carbon dioxide doubling. Previous studies suggest 3 kelvin (K) as the best estimate, 2 to 4.5 K as the 66% probability range, and nonzero probabilities for much higher values, the latter implying a small chance of high-impact climate changes that would be difficult to avoid. Here, combining extensive sea and land surface temperature reconstructions from the Last Glacial Maximum with climate model simulations,​ we estimate a lower median (2.3 K) and reduced uncertainty (1.7 to 2.6 K as the 66% probability range, which can be widened using alternate assumptions or data subsets). Assuming that paleoclimatic constraints apply to the future, as predicted by our model, these results imply a lower probability of imminent extreme climatic change than previously thought.'' ​The data, but not the paper may be downlaoded for free from [[http://​people.oregonstate.edu/​~schmita2/#​y2011|Andreas'​ website]].
  
  
pmip3/wg/p2f/methods.txt · Last modified: 2017/02/10 15:47 by jules