pmip3:wg:var:index
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| pmip3:wg:var:index [2014/02/24 17:46] – [Actions] brierley | pmip3:wg:var:index [2017/10/06 17:12] (current) – [Actions] brierley | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| /* ~~DISCUSSION~~ */ | /* ~~DISCUSSION~~ */ | ||
| - | ====== PMIP3 WG - PaleoVAR ====== | + | ====== PMIP3 Cross-cutting activity |
| <note info>\\ Contacts: [[c.brierley@ucl.ac.uk|Chris Brierley]], [[pascale.braconnot@lsce.ipsl.fr|Pascale Braconnot]]</ | <note info>\\ Contacts: [[c.brierley@ucl.ac.uk|Chris Brierley]], [[pascale.braconnot@lsce.ipsl.fr|Pascale Braconnot]]</ | ||
| - | + | ===== Activity | |
| - | ===== Group description ===== | + | |
| The primary focus of PMIP efforts so far has been to look at changes in the mean climate and how these are modelled. However, GCMs also simulate internal variability about that mean state. Its study requires both high resolution proxy data and the storing of larger model datasets - which has been developing through the PMIP iterations. | The primary focus of PMIP efforts so far has been to look at changes in the mean climate and how these are modelled. However, GCMs also simulate internal variability about that mean state. Its study requires both high resolution proxy data and the storing of larger model datasets - which has been developing through the PMIP iterations. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
| ===== Actions ===== | ===== Actions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === How can we make it easier to study variability? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Status: [[http:// | ||
| + | * Contact: Chris Brierley | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many people start their research by downloading lots of model data from ESFG and then computing the same diagnostics. This can be a particular hurdle for field/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Do simulations show additional modes of variability in the past? === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Status: Being contemplated | ||
| + | * Contact: Chris Brierley | ||
| + | |||
| + | A great advantage of palaeoclimate observations has been the discovery of unforeseen climate transitions and variability. One example of this is the discovery of millennial scale variability in glacial conditions. Currently no systematic tool exists to look for new modes of variability across palaeoclimate simulations. How could we address this? | ||
| === Establishing the present cutting edge of PalaeoENSO research === | === Establishing the present cutting edge of PalaeoENSO research === | ||
| Line 29: | Line 42: | ||
| === Investigation into the methodology of model-data comparisons for PalaeoENSO === | === Investigation into the methodology of model-data comparisons for PalaeoENSO === | ||
| - | * Status: | + | * Status: |
| * Contact: Julien Emile-Geay | * Contact: Julien Emile-Geay | ||
| How should one combine and contrast the different sources of information on past ENSO variability? | How should one combine and contrast the different sources of information on past ENSO variability? | ||
| - | === Do simulations show additional modes of variability in the past? === | + | ===== Subsidiary Topics |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Status: Being contemplated | + | |
| - | * Contact: Chris Brierley | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | A great advantage of palaeoclimate observations has been the discovery of unforeseen climate transitions and variability. One example of this is the discovery of millenial scale variability in glacial conditions. Currently no systematic tool exists to look for new modes of variability across palaeoclimate simulations. How could we address this? | + | |
| - | ===== More ===== | + | |
| * [[members|Members]] | * [[members|Members]] | ||
| + | * [[synthesis|Synthesis]] | ||
| * [[meetings|Meetings]] | * [[meetings|Meetings]] | ||
| + | * [[http:// | ||
| + | * [[data|Some old ENSO timeseries]] | ||
| \\ \\ \\ | \\ \\ \\ | ||
pmip3/wg/var/index.1393260388.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/02/24 17:46 by brierley