Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
test_cases:six [2014/05/21 10:44] grenier |
test_cases:six [2020/06/30 16:16] (current) grenier |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | **Case | + | **Case |
The full coupled system is resolved. | The full coupled system is resolved. | ||
- | + | The difference with Case TH1 is that a cold boundary condition is imposed that challenges the effect of water heat advection. Depending on the intensity of the flow, the initial talik system opens or closes. | |
- | {{ equations.jpg? | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | The difference with Case TH1 is that an imposed | + | |
Initial conditions are provided below (boolean temperature zones, +5°C in the middle, the talik, and -5°C in the semi-circular geometries to the side). Heat boundary conditions are imposed upstream (left) temperature (+5°C), downstream conductive component no-flow (exit by advection only), imposed negative temperatures (-5°C) on lateral sides. | Initial conditions are provided below (boolean temperature zones, +5°C in the middle, the talik, and -5°C in the semi-circular geometries to the side). Heat boundary conditions are imposed upstream (left) temperature (+5°C), downstream conductive component no-flow (exit by advection only), imposed negative temperatures (-5°C) on lateral sides. | ||
Line 19: | Line 15: | ||
- | // | + | **The whole information about Benchmark Case TH3 (including parameter |
+ | |||
+ | **The results are now published and available as data file from the [[intercomparaison_results: | ||
- | ... |