pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet [2009/12/07 17:16] – pasb | pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet [2013/10/16 12:45] (current) – [Northern Hemisphere (GLAC-1)] Added ref to EPSL 2012 paper jypeter | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | //Note: use paragraph below... | ||
+ | |||
+ | The ice sheet provided for PMIP3/CMIP5 LGM experiments is a blended product obtained by averaging three different ice sheets: | ||
+ | * ICE6G provided by Dick Peltier | ||
+ | * MOCA provided by Lev Tarasov | ||
+ | * ANU provided by Kurt Lambeck | ||
+ | |||
+ | A short description and references for the different ice sheets is provided under the link below: | ||
+ | [[pmip3: | ||
+ | |||
+ | This solution was proposed by PMIP bureau in light of a community checking. Given the uncertainties that still exist on the reconstruction of the ice-sheet, resulting from uncertainties in datation for the data used for global or regional constraints, | ||
Several PMIP participants were in favour of using a new ice-sheet reconstruction for PMIP3/CMIP5 that better matches the geomorphologic and glaciological constraints than the ICE-5G reconstruction used in PMIP2. | Several PMIP participants were in favour of using a new ice-sheet reconstruction for PMIP3/CMIP5 that better matches the geomorphologic and glaciological constraints than the ICE-5G reconstruction used in PMIP2. | ||
Line 146: | Line 160: | ||
108(B3), 2143, doi: | 108(B3), 2143, doi: | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
+ | * [[http:// | ||
=== Data === | === Data === |
pmip3/design/pi/final/icesheet.1260202587.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/12/07 17:16 by pasb