pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet [2009/12/07 16:16] pasb |
pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet [2013/10/16 10:45] (current) jypeter [Northern Hemisphere (GLAC-1)] Added ref to EPSL 2012 paper |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | //Note: use paragraph below... | ||
| + | |||
| + | The ice sheet provided for PMIP3/CMIP5 LGM experiments is a blended product obtained by averaging three different ice sheets: | ||
| + | * ICE6G provided by Dick Peltier | ||
| + | * MOCA provided by Lev Tarasov | ||
| + | * ANU provided by Kurt Lambeck | ||
| + | |||
| + | A short description and references for the different ice sheets is provided under the link below: | ||
| + | [[pmip3:design:pi:final:icesheet|LGM icesheet description]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | This solution was proposed by PMIP bureau in light of a community checking. Given the uncertainties that still exist on the reconstruction of the ice-sheet, resulting from uncertainties in datation for the data used for global or regional constraints, climate intput from ice core temperature reconstructions or climate model simulations, etc... it sounds reasonable to consider that the average is a best estimate of the LGM ice-sheet.// | ||
| Several PMIP participants were in favour of using a new ice-sheet reconstruction for PMIP3/CMIP5 that better matches the geomorphologic and glaciological constraints than the ICE-5G reconstruction used in PMIP2. | Several PMIP participants were in favour of using a new ice-sheet reconstruction for PMIP3/CMIP5 that better matches the geomorphologic and glaciological constraints than the ICE-5G reconstruction used in PMIP2. | ||
| Line 146: | Line 160: | ||
| 108(B3), 2143, doi:10.1029/2001JB001731, 2003]] | 108(B3), 2143, doi:10.1029/2001JB001731, 2003]] | ||
| * [[http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/people/lev/g5jpub.pdf|Tarasov, L., and W. R. Peltier, Greenland glacial history and local geodynamic consequences, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 150, Pages 198-229, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01702.x, 2002]] | * [[http://www.atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca/people/lev/g5jpub.pdf|Tarasov, L., and W. R. Peltier, Greenland glacial history and local geodynamic consequences, Geophysical Journal International, Volume 150, Pages 198-229, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01702.x, 2002]] | ||
| + | * [[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X11005243|Tarasov, Lev and Arthur S. Dyke and Radford M. Neal and W. R. Peltier, A data-calibrated distribution of deglacial chronologies for the North American ice complex from glaciological modeling, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volumes 315–316, 15 January 2012, Pages 30-40]] | ||
| === Data === | === Data === | ||
pmip3/design/pi/final/icesheet.1260202587.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/12/07 16:16 by pasb
