Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice [2015/02/18 18:22] – [Foreword] ruza
+++ pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice [2015/03/02 11:17] – [Sea Level Equivalent (SLE)] ruza
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
    More info here: http://wiki.splitbrain.org/plugin:discussion */
-/* ~~DISCUSSION|Discussion on core experiment design~~ *
+~~DISCUSSION|Discussion on core experiment design~~
 ====== Last Deglaciation Ice Sheets ======
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 [[pmip3:wg:degla:bc:core|Go back]] to the main core experiment design page. \\
 [[pmip3:wg:degla:index|Go back]] to the main working group page. \\
-Please note, this page is a work in progress and is not ready for discussion yet. \\
 \\
 Please use the //Discussion// section below to specifically comment on the choice of __ice sheet reconstructions__ for the core experiment.
@@ Line 56: / Line 55: @@
 The information in this section was provided directly by Dick Peltier et al., October 2014:
-> Time dependent //ice-equivalent// contribution to eustatic sea level rise [relative to present day] from each of the primary geographical regions from which grounded ice loss occurred during the [last] deglaciation process. ((Plot provided by Dick Peltier, October 2014)) {{ http://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~earri/pmip_deglac/ICE-6GC_ESL.png?400 |ICE-6G_C Eustatic Sea Level Equivalent of ice volume }}
+> Time dependent //ice-equivalent// contribution to eustatic sea level rise [relative to present day] from each of the primary geographical regions from which grounded ice loss occurred during the [last] deglaciation process. ((Plot provided by Dick Peltier, October 2014)) {{ http://homepages.see.leeds.ac.uk/~earri/pmip_deglac/ICE-6GC_ESL.png?500 |ICE-6G_C Eustatic Sea Level Equivalent of ice volume }}
 ^  Ice-equivalent contribution to eustatic sea level rise (m) ((relative to present day and assuming ocean area = 360,768,600 km<sup>2</sup>))  ^^^^
@@ Line 162: / Line 161: @@
 Please think about the following points and add any comments on these or any other aspects of the experiment design to the discussion section below: [Topics will be added here as they are raised below or by email.]
   * Should ICE-6G_C be provided here in its smoothed format, as offered by Dick Peltier (above;  [[pmip3:wg:degla:bc:ice#smoothed_fields]]), its original unsmoothed format, or both?
-  * Should Lev Tarasov's reconstruction be provided with a 500 year timestep? It is currently 1000 years, but can be rerun with a shorter timestep.\\ \\
+  * Should Lev Tarasov's reconstruction be provided with a 500 year timestep? It is currently 1000 years, but could be provided with a shorter timestep.\\ \\
 ----